Hybrid vs. Native
An introduction to cross-platform hybrid development for architects and app development leaders.
The growing adoption of hybrid is evident in a recent Forrester survey that found two-thirds of developers are choosing a cross- platform or web-based approach over native tools2. Meanwhile, top brands like Target, Nationwide, and Southwest Airlines have chosen a hybrid approach over native to power apps for their customers and employees.
The top reasons for making the switch from native to hybrid, based on independent research and testimonials, are:
Building for multiple platforms from a single codebase often makes delivering cross-platform apps 2-3x faster than native.
Reduced development times, and the avoided costs of hiring and retaining specialized native talent, can save teams 60% or more compared to native3.
Design & ux Consistency
With one codebase running on desktop, mobile, and web, hybrid apps provide better design and UX consistency across channels.
Hybrid gives web developers and businesses with in-house web teams the tools to build powerful mobile apps using their existing skills and talent.
Put together, the advantages of hybrid have helped centralized development teams close the gap and better satisfy the demand for mobile apps for customers and internal employees.
What is a hybrid app?
Hybrid apps are native apps. They’re downloaded from the platform’s app store or marketplace and offer the same native features, offline support, and hardware-based performance acceleration as any app built with a native SDK.
Hybrid apps run in a full-screen browser, called a webview, that is invisible to the user. Through customizable native plugins, they can access the native features of specific mobile devices (such as the camera or touch ID), without the core code being tied to that device.
That means cross-platform hybrid applications can run on any platform or device, all from a single codebase, while still delivering native performance.
Comparing hybrid vs. native
In the sections that follow, we’ll provide a one-to-one comparison of hybrid vs. native, highlighting the pros and cons of each approach.
It’s important to keep in mind that the decision to choose hybrid or native should be based on the unique goals of your organization, the circumstances of a given project, and composition of your existing development team.
Of course, we’re betting big on the power of the web and the promise and potential of cross-platform hybrid development. But we understand that individual circumstances should drive which route you choose.
Hopefully, this comparison guide will give you some useful tips to help you choose the right approach for your next project. But keep in mind, there’s often plenty of room to accommodate different approaches in a single organization. It’s not always an either-or decision.
Let’s take a look at each of these.
– Write once, run anywhere – Rarely is a mobile app only designed for a single platform. Consumers, partners, and employees all have a choice of platforms and devices.
– Use the talent you already have
– Deliver a great user experience across platforms
– Build for the future
With a hybrid framework like Ionic, you can run your app on any platform or device-
Following the native approach, that means you need to build separate apps for each mobile platform, and sometimes specific apps for tablets and smartphones.
This is where hybrid development shines.
With a hybrid framework like Ionic, you can run your app on any platform or device, all from a single codebase. Ionic also provides adaptive styling, so the look-and-feel of your app isn’t one-size-fits-all. It automatically adapts to each platform. And because hybrid technology is web-based, you can run your app in any modern browser as a Progressive Web App, or PWA.
That means your users get a great experience across platforms and devices, and you only have one codebase to worry about.
Use the talent you already have
The web developer community is about 10x greater in size than the number of native mobile app developers, according to the latest Stack Overflow survey. Many development teams already have
Why not leverage the talent you already have in-house to build your next mobile apps?
With a hybrid framework like Ionic, your existing web teams can build high- performance apps that run on any platform or device, using the tools and technology they already know and love.
That’s a lot easier than outsourcing development, or recruiting, training, and hiring specialists. Plus, centralizing on a single skill set makes it much easier to reassign teams when a project is finished—whether that’s a desktop web app or another mobile project.
Deliver the best UX across platforms
Native advocates will claim that only a native approach can deliver the speed and performance that you need to create a great user experience. That may have been true five years ago, but today’s solutions offer the same hardware-based performance acceleration as native apps. Ionic is committed to providing a framework that is equal in performance to its native counterparts.
And as the Sanvello team found, user experience isn’t just about performance. Simplifying the development process and consolidating onto a single codebase means more time to add features, fewer potential defects, and more time to fix bugs that find their way through.
Most importantly, users expect a seamless experience as they move across platforms and devices. If your mobile app is completely out of sync with your desktop or tablet app, that’s not a good experience. By leveraging the web platform for both your mobile and desktop solutions, you will have a wider shared codebase, that will give you that brand consistency and common user experience.
some say – “ With hybrid, we can run our app across multiple platforms from the get-go, so we can focus on iterating features that are important to the product, as opposed to getting mired in the intricacies of native development. ”
Build for the future
Development organizations are tasked to build applications for the future. Moving now to the web platform offers you richer, more innovative options moving forward.
The web represents the most stable and time-tested universal runtime in the world.
And today, the web is powering a growing and diverse set of applications—from traditional mobile and desktop apps to Progressive Web Apps, wearables, and IoT devices.
Additionally, by choosing a hybrid framework based on open web standards, you’ll future-proof your development strategy in some other important ways. For example, the latest version of Ionic works with any JS framework, including React, Vue, and Angular, so your teams can continue to use the diverse set of tools and approaches they prefer— today and tomorrow.
Drawbacks of hybrid
– system overhead
The use of the webview may introduce a degree of overhead compared to native. The abundance of performance APIs and increasingly powerful hardware have made this less of a factor
in recent years, but it’s still something to consider. For most applications, the difference in performance is hardly noticeable. But for 3D games and other performance-intensive applications, a hybrid solution may not be the best choice.
– plugin management
Cross-platform solutions like Ionic—as well as React Native and others—are able to access nearly every native feature of a device, like the camera or gyroscope, by using native plugins that unlock native device features and
– third-party dependence
Choosing a cross-platform approach means you’re placing trust in the maker of the framework vendor (whether it’s Ionic, React Native, Xamarin, etc.) to keep up with the latest and greatest native features and design
patterns of each mobile platform. While Ionic is committed to keeping up with new Android and iOS versions, there’s still a dependency any time you choose something other than the native SDK.
Let’s explore the common reasons for choosing native.
– Rich native library
– No third-party dependencies
Benefits of native development
Native is still the preferred approach for many mobile developers. And there are some good reasons for that. While part of that is based on the legacy of having few viable alternatives, native still has its advantages today.
rich native library
Using native SDKs allows the developer to access the latest features specifically designed for those platforms, without the complexity of dealing with native plugins. This is a great option if you’re already familiar with native tools and languages and don’t want or need an additional layer of abstraction.
no third-party dependencies
By building exclusively with a native SDKs, developers aren’t bound to any third-party to keep up with support, and there’s not as much of a
dependency on open source communities like Cordova to keep up with the latest features.
Challenges of native development
Here are the most frequently cited challenges associated with native development:
longer development cycles
Native apps usually have longer development cycles, especially when building for multiple platforms, which requires two or three different code bases for iOS, Android, and desktop. Each platform has its own nuances that require specific changes, updates, and maintenance which bloat the cost of an application and add development time. This creates a lot of
iterations within the development process in order to customize and test for each platform, it also reduces your agility to launch your application or push updates.
high development costs
Simply put, developing mobile applications natively can be expensive and time-consuming, mostly driven by the time it takes to build for each platform, along with the cost of hiring and retaining highly specialized native talent.
Creating custom UI components to match your company’s design system or pattern library can be more challenging with native components because you’re limited to the design patterns supported by each platform. And unlike web components, native components can’t be shared outside of their native platform, so you’ll need to maintain multiple UI libraries.
native talent hard to find
Finding and hiring iOS and Android developers is difficult, given that less than 7% of all developers are versed in the necessary programming
languages. It’s also difficult to repurpose those developers for other projects outside of mobile.
Comparing cross-platform approaches
While the various cross-platform frameworks available today—Ionic, Xamarin, Flutter, and React Native—may appear similar on the surface, there are a lot of differences between them that you’ll realize as you dig in.
There’s a lot to cover here, so if you’re interested in learning more, check out our comparison guides: Ionic React vs. React Native and Ionic vs Flutter.
Each approach has its benefits and drawbacks, which typically come down to debates about performance, code sharing, customization, and portability.
On top of that, Ionic an end-to-end platform to help professional developers and teams speed up and simplify app development and delivery across mobile, desktop, and the web.
Download Android Native App
Mehndi Android Application – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.rcube.mehndi_designs
Riddles – दिमागी पहेलियाँ – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.app.paheliya.puzzleworld
Interview Puzzles – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.puzzles.top_interview_que
Learn Vocabulary English – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.learner.learn_vocabulary
Learn English Grammar App – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.app.learn_english.grammer
Download Mathematics Basic Concepts – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.app.tricks.basicmathematics
Subscribe My youtube channel – https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMA3mLBrsmckaigc0hlR4AA/
Like My Facebook Page – https://www.facebook.com/MehndiDesignheena/
Subscribe My telegram channel – https://t.me/mehndi_design_dekho